Institutional Analysis

Unearthing and eliminating systemic biases


What We Work For

We work to eliminate systemic biases that unfairly damage certain populations, in partnership with the systems themselves.

Child welfare systems across the country are striving to keep children safe and to help them live with a loving, permanent family (their own whenever possible). These public systems are judged by—and accountable to—the federal government, state legislatures, communities, and frequently lawsuits and consent decrees. There are myriad reasons why these systems don’t meet the needs of those they serve as often as they should but failures are often rooted in institutional policies, practices, and biases that inhibit caseworkers from effectively assisting children and families.

How We Do It

We partner with local public systems to use a structured qualitative methodology to identify how institutions of child welfare or juvenile justice could work more effectively for families, with a particular focus on families of color.

Investigative teams apply qualitative tools and analysis to examine institutional features that influence how cases are processed—and thus may contribute to racial and ethnic disproportionality and disparity or inequities related to sexual orientation and gender identity. The Institutional Analysis (IA) can help assess current—and develop new—assumptions, concepts, theories, practices, policies, procedures, and initiatives and serve as an organizing tool to improve coordination and working relationships and mobilize joint action among intervening agencies and the communities they serve.

When implicit biases are brought to the surface and eliminated through careful, collaborative work, public systems can adjust structural and institutional policies and practices to better support the communities they serve.

Institutional Analysis

CSSP and Ellen Pence of Praxis International, Inc. developed the Institutional Analysis (IA) to uncover problematic policies and practices that define and constrain child welfare systems, with a focus on contributors to racial disparities in child welfare services and outcomes. The IA is a diagnostic process to reveal and address the disconnect between what a child or youth and their family need to be safe, and how institutions are organized to act.

The IA team, led by local and national experts, asks questions from the standpoint of children, youth, parents, and caregivers involved with child welfare systems. The analysis is intended to help child welfare systems, their institutional and community partners, external community groups, and advocacy organizations work toward the common goals of improving safety, permanency, and well-being outcomes. Over the last several years,  we have applied the IA to examining the experiences of LGBTQ and gender expansive youth in child welfare (three times) and youth of color involved with the juvenile justice system (one time).

The IA examines institutional policies and practices and the logic, thinking, and assumptions that support them. By asking how something comes about, rather than who is doing it, the analysis reveals systemic problems and produces recommendations for more permanent and effective change.

Institutional Analysis Outcomes

While the process of Institutional Analysis (IA) is an evolutionary one and outcomes are often slow to surface, we have seen success in a number of jurisdictions including:

Fairfax County, Virginia. In 2012, a multi-year institutional analysis process explored the disproportionate contact of African-American and Hispanic youth with Fairfax, Virginia’s juvenile justice system.

Fresno, California. The IA examined policies, practices, attitudes, and beliefs that contributed to African American children experiencing low reunification rates with their parents and insufficient attention to their developmental needs while in long-term foster care.

Los Angeles, California. The IA explored the experiences of African-American children and youth who do not reunify with their parents or find alternate, timely permanency in three county offices (Pomona, Torrance, and Wateridge). The IA identified county wide and office specific policies and practices that contribute to these poor outcomes.

Santa Clara and Fresno, California. In the 2015, IAs in two separate counties examined issues for Latino children, youth and families based on challenges unique to each county. The IAs also examined how these two counties can be more supportive LGBTQ and gender expansive youth and ensure that out-of-home placements are safe and affirming.

Our Experts

Sarah Morrison

Sarah A. Morrison

Director, Learning & Evidence
SEE FULL PROFILE  
Kristen Weber

Kristen Weber

Director, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice
SEE FULL PROFILE